Download presentation
#### DEDICATION - Description

### Tags

fluid cell
tumor model
cell
fluid
model
tumor
tissue
figure
cells
wall
material
finite
element
stress
solid
analysis
models

## Presentation on theme: "DEDICATION"â€” Presentation transcript

Shom More....

vTABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACTDEDICATIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viTABLE OF CONTENTS viiLIST OF FIGURES xLIST OF TABLES xiv CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1 Background 1Motivation 2Objective 6 II COMPUT ID: 870820 Download Pdf

Embed / Share - DEDICATION

1
**v
DEDICATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS **

v
DEDICATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................DEDICATION.....................................................................................................................ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................ viTABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................... viiLIST OF FIGURES...............................................................................................

2
**............... xLIST OF TABLES.........**

............... xLIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................ xiv CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION........................................................................................... 1 Background............................................................................................... 1Motivation................................................................................................. 2Objective.................................................................................................... 6 II COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF BIOLOGICAL CELL....................

3
**10 Introduction.........................**

10 Introduction............................................................................................... 10Cell Physiology......................................................................................... 10Cytoskeleton....................................................................................... 11Cytosol and organelles...................................................................... 15Cell membrane................................................................................... 15Formulation of Constitutive Model....................................................... 16Mechanical models of cell.........................

4
**........................................**

........................................ 16Theoretical formulation..................................................................... 18Results........................................................................................................ 23Constitutive modeling example....................................................... 23Numerical verification-finite element analysis.............................. 26Discussion ................................................................................................. 36Summary.................................................................................................... 38
CHAPTER P

5
**ageVI CONCLUSIONS.......................**

ageVI CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................. 118 Concluding Remarks and Summary...................................................... 118Future Works............................................................................................ 120 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................... 121 VITA ..........................................................................................................................
Page Figure 3.12. Variation of filtration velocity with permeability

6
**coefficient of also decreases...........**

coefficient of also decreases............................................................................................... 62 Figure 3.13. Velocity profile for an artery with various degrees of constrictions.... 65 Figure 3.14. Variation of maximum fluid velocity with block %................................ 66 Figure 3.15. Pressure variation (N/m) due to stenosis. The maximum drop in pressure is observed for the 60% block..................................................... 68 Figure 3.16. Displacement of artery wall for the computational domain selected. erable undulations in the artery Figure 4.1. Flow chart of oncogenesis......................

7
**........................................**

..................................................... 72 Figure 4.2. Development of tumor................................................................................ 74 Figure 4.3. Finite element model for the analysis of a) benign and b) malignant tumor cell obtained with an indentation using a spherical indenter of above the nucleus.............................................. 78 Figure 4.4. Force deflection curve for (a) benign and (b) malignant tumor cell..... 81 Figure 4.5. Strain distribution for AFM indentation simulation for (a) benign and (b) malignant tumor cell...................................................................... 8

8
**2 Figure 4.6. Displacement distribution **

2 Figure 4.6. Displacement distribution for AFM indentation simulation for (a) benign and (b) malignant tumor cell........................................................ 83 Figure 5.1. Concentration profile in lumen and artery wall...................................... 104 Figure 5.2. Concentration profile in artery wall.......................................................... 104 Figure 5.3. Concentration profile in media.................................................................. 105 Figure 5.4. Concentration profile for different values of the endothelial permeability.....................................................................

9
**............................. 106 Figure**

............................. 106 Figure 5.5. Concentration profile for varying solid phase volume fractions of endothelial layer.......................................................................................... 106
xiv
Page Table 3.1. Material parameters of artery wall............................................................ 58 Table 4.1. Finite element modeling of breast, spine and brain tumor, with the material models and results....................................................................... 95
2
can develop into specialized cells through external stimuli like mechanical forces. Studies on the force distribut

10
**ion on stem cells and its corresponding **

ion on stem cells and its corresponding physiological response would immensely help in designing cells for specific purposes. Thus, the primary focus of this research work is the development of mathematical models for cells and tissues to analyze its response to external mechanical loading. The response of a normal and pathological biological structure is drastically different. The alteration in the sensing and material property is the primary reason behind the change in the physiological response. Of late, the variation in the response of the cells and tissues are used to determine the pathological nature of these materials. Detection of malaria a

11
**ffected cells through cell extension and**

ffected cells through cell extension and compression of tissues for tumor detection are some of the examples. So, along with the determination of stress distribution in the biomaterials, it is aimed to implement the mathematical models to predict the behavior of pathological cells for diagnostic purposes and also in tissue engineering. generalized cell, which consists of features from all cell types, is shown in Figure 1.1. The major parts of the generalized cell are cytoplasm, nucleus and cell membrane. The cytoplasm consists of biopolymer filaments called cytoskeleton. Actin, microtubule, and intermediate filaments are the three main cytoskeletal

12
** filaments providing stiffness to the ce**

filaments providing stiffness to the cell structure. Scanned images and experimental procedures have shown that there exist regions in cytoplasm having distinct physical properties.
4
by other authors [7, 8], and it is reported that the stiffness of the cell reduces in certain pathological conditions like cancer [9, 10]. A precise representation of the anisotropic, nonlinear behavior of the cytoskeletal architecture is required for any computational analysis of a living cell. The homogenous material property definition of the cell is far from being accurate, especially for an adherent cell in which stress fiber introduces significant inhomogen

13
**eity. Discrete cell models like the cel**

eity. Discrete cell models like the cellular tensegrity models [11], which represent the cell using a finite number of cytoskeletal filaments, have limitations in studying cell behavior. These limitations have led to a number of researchers turning towards continuum based models through the use of simplifying assumptions. Most of the earlier works, based on continuum hypothesis, homogenize the entire cell and do not explicitly consider the effect of inhomogeneity of the cell, with some exceptions being the works of [2, 3, 6]. These have lead to nonphysical correlation of the experimentally observed parameters to the mechanical characteristics of th

14
**e cell. To overcome such a limitation, a**

e cell. To overcome such a limitation, a constitutive model capable of accounting for the inhomogeneity of the Mechanical modeling of single cells would be extremely useful in understanding the behavior of cells in an experimental setup. response of cells requires mathematical modeling of the embedding environment like fibers and fluid making the extra cellular matrix. As the transmission of mechanical stimuli in cells occurs either through the extra cellular matrix surrounding the cells the determination
6
been used extensively in the modeling of tissues like arterial wall [17]. The single phase models can be considered as a special case of t

15
**he multiphase models. In this scenario, **

he multiphase models. In this scenario, we propose to study the mechanics of soft tissues through the multiphasic material models which could be converted to a single phase model depending on the type of Fluid-structure interaction problems, as applied to biomechanical systems, have been solved using a wide range of methods [18-20]. A sequential solving of the individual solid and fluid phases to coupled algorithm with a biphasic representation of tissue have been developed to study the interactions [21-24]. A new fluid-tissue interface finite element model to study blood tissue interactions is developed in this dissertation. The different stages in

16
** the application of computational model **

the application of computational model to a complex system like biological cells/tissues are: a) development of a mathematical model, b) numerical solution of the mathematical model, and c) verification and implementation of the model to study cell/tissue behavior. The main objective of this dissertation is to develop a computational framework for the mechanical behavior of eukaryotic cells (cells with nucleus). The primary steps undertaken in the modeling of cells are as follows: identify primary microcellular components responsible for the
8
Physiological behavior of cells and tissues are dependent on the transfer of nutrients and proteins

17
**in the tissues. So, a model to study tra**

in the tissues. So, a model to study transfer of nutrients and proteins from fluid into tissues by incorporating mass transfer of macromolecule into the fluid-tissue finite element model, studying the influence on flow characteristics on LDL deposition in the distribution of nutrients in a controlled environment for tissue engineering application. This dissertation is organized as follows. The development of a mechanical formulation of cell accounting for the inhomogeneity of the cytoplasm is given in Chapter II. The validation of the constitutive model using finite element analysis by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and magnetic twisting cytometry (M

18
**TC) is presented in the chapter. A good **

TC) is presented in the chapter. A good correlation between simulated results and experimental values are observed from the analysis. In this chapter, the probable cause of difference in the derived mechanical property of cell is also identified. In Chapter III, the material properties of the extra cellular matrix surrounding the cells in a soft tissue is analyzed using a biphasic model. The biphasic material model is extended to study fluid-tissue interface to model blood flow through a healthy and diseased artery. The variations in the fluid flow and behavior of artery wall is also analyzed in this chapter.
CHAPTER II COMPUTATIONAL MODELING

19
**OF BIOLOGICAL CELL Introduction Cell is **

OF BIOLOGICAL CELL Introduction Cell is the fundamental unit of any living organism and has long been observed to respond physiologically to external mechanical stimuli. The first step towards understanding the physiological behavior is to comprehend its response to external mechanical stimuli. Through suitable experimental and theoretical formulations the mechanical properties of cells have been derived by a number of researchers [1-3, 8]. These derived material properties have found to vary by orders of magnitude even for the same cell type. The primary cause of such a disparity is attributed to the stimulation process, and the theoretical model u

20
**sed in interpreting the experimental dat**

sed in interpreting the experimental data [4]. This drawback is to be overcome by the developing a sound mathematical framework correlating the material of the cell with the evaluation of the experimental data. Cytoplasm, cell membrane, and nucleus are the main structural components of the cell. Cytoplasm consists of fluid like cytosol containing organelles (mitochondria, nucleus, etc), the cytoskeleton, and a variety of other molecules. Cytoskeleton, which forms the biomechanical framework, is responsible for maintaining the structural integrity and also the distribution of forces in a cell. The organelles present in cytosol, except for the nucleu

21
**s, do not contribute significantly to th**

s, do not contribute significantly to the structural integrity of a cell
Figure 2.1. Stained image of bovine cell, green and red indicates cytoskeletal filaments Figure 2.2. Behavior of cytoskeletal filaments. Actin Filament: Actin filaments are formed by the polymerization of actin protein monomers and have a diameter of approximately 8nm. Actin is the abundant protein in many eukaryotic cells and constitutes about 5-10% of the total protein content
Intermediate Microtubule
in a cell. They are distributed throughout the cell with typical concentrations of 1-5mg/ml. Actin filaments in the presence of the Actin Binding Proteins (ABPs), like f

22
**ilamin and fimbrin, forms a series of ne**

ilamin and fimbrin, forms a series of networks or bundles. Two prominent structures formed by actin filaments are the actin cortex, and stress fibers. Actin cortex is a three-dimensional networks formed as a thick band below the plasma membrane providing additional strength to the membrane. Actin stress fibers are formed by the bundling of actin filaments through rigid connections in an adherent cell. The stress fibers originate from the cortical layer where it connects to the plasma membrane through focal points and either connects with another focal point or would end in a network of other cytoskeletal filaments. They act as structural regulators

23
**within the cells influencing cell behavi**

within the cells influencing cell behavior like adhesion and cell contraction. Intermediate Filaments (IF): Intermediate filaments are woven rope like structures, slightly thicker than F-actin, with a diameter of 8-10 nm. Unlike actin filaments, the fundamental units of intermediate filaments are fibrous proteins of 2-3 nm wide. Keratin, vimentin, neurofilament, desmin are some of the intermediate filaments which comes under the broad classification of Type I, Type II and Type III intermediate filaments. The intermediate filament network envelopes the nucleus and is closely interconnected with the microtubule filaments extending throughout the cytop

24
**lasm. The interrelation between intermed**

lasm. The interrelation between intermediate filaments and microtubule is largely unknown though it is believed that MT pulls the intermediate filaments towards the membrane [25]. The primary function of intermediate filament is to provide mechanical stability to the cytoplasm and the nucleus.
Cytosol and organelles The cytosol is a fluid medium in the cytoplasm consisting of the organelles and the cytoskeleton. Cytosol aids in the biological response of the cell and preserves the incompressible nature of cell. The organelles present in cytosol, except for the nucleus, do not contribute significantly to the structural integrity of a cell. So th

25
**ese effects are not considered for compu**

ese effects are not considered for computational analysis in most of the cases. Nucleus occupies a volume of nearly 20% of cytosol has a significant bearing on the behavior of the cell (see Figure 2.1). Structurally it can be considered as a single entity and experimentally it is found to have a shear modulus higher than the cytoplasm [28]. The cytosol is responsible for the viscoelastic nature of the cell. The cell membrane is composed of a semi permeable bilipid layer. The effect of the cell membrane on the structural property varies according to the type of the cell. For example, in erythrocyte the cell membrane contributes significantly to the

26
**structural behavior of the cell. In cons**

structural behavior of the cell. In constant, the influence of plasma membrane for an adherent cell is negligible. Cell membrane is responsible for adherence and the motion of cell over a substrate. Adhesion is achieved through a series of transmembrane proteins which connects the extra cellular matrix with the cytoskeleton. Movement of cell is achieved through the lamellipods and through a series of polymerization and depolymerization of cell skeleton. Focal points are created in the membrane which connects with the cytoskeleton and that helps in the movement of cell.
Governing equations are developed using these quantities to predict the mech

27
**anical behavior of the cell when subject**

anical behavior of the cell when subjected to relevant boundary conditions. The continuum mechanical models available in the literature range from simple directly solvable models to complex models that require numerical solution tools like finite element Most of the mechanical cell models consider the entire cytoplasm as a single unit, a fact which is far from being physiologically accurate. These models, even though reduces the mechanical parameters, fails to capture the properties caused by the structural inhomogeneity of cytoplasm, like actin network layer, stress fibers etc. This becomes a crucial factor in the study of mechanical behavior of ce

28
**lls in-vivo as well as in the determinat**

lls in-vivo as well as in the determination of mechanical parameters using experimental techniques like atomic force microscopy and micropipette suction. In this work, a mechanical model of an adherent cell based on continuum micromechanics considering the structural inhomogeneity of the cytoplasm is developed. The homogenized cytoplasm is considered to be a matrix reinforced with stress fibers; the periplasm or the actin cortex as a layer of semi-flexible polymer networks and the nucleus are the various constituents whose properties considered uence of individual layers on the mechanical response of a cell using atomic force microscopy is also st

29
**udied in this work. This work also deals**

udied in this work. This work also deals with the effect of actin filaments (stress-fibers) on the mechanical properties of the cell and its variations in the presence of actin disrupting chemicals like cytochalasin D so as to provide a foundation towards building a tissue model to predict cancer growth.
Modeling of Cortical Cytoplasm: The actin cortex region is modeled as a hyperelastic material by assuming the cortical region to be of an isotropic distribution of the actin network filaments. The general form of strain energy is given as [32] 123123,,0(,,)333pqrWIIIcIII âˆ’âˆ’âˆ’ (2.1) are th

30
**e material properties, (123
) are the st**

e material properties, (123
) are the strain invariants that can be expressed in terms of the principal stretches (123
222112322222221321322223123
OOOOO (2.2) Modeling of Inner Cytoplasm: Cytoplasm is composed of an organized network of cytoskeletal filaments of actin, intermediate filaments and microtubules. The distribution of the cytoskeletal filaments differs according to the type and environment of the cell, thus changing their material properties. The stress fibers are contractile bundles of actin filaments [25] having diameters in the range of one-tenths of microns. Experimental and theoretical works have sh

31
**own that the cell behaviors like adhesio**

own that the cell behaviors like adhesion and motion are dependent on these stress fibers [26, 27]. The constitutive model developed in this work considers the stress fibers as being distributed in the cytoplasm, satisfying the continuum hypothesis. With an idealization of the cytoplasm to be a “fiber-reinforced composite”, the effective property is obtained by borrowing ideas from the widely accepted homogenization theories in composite materials. The
(2.4) denotes the volume-averaged stress and strain tensors, respectively, over the RVE volume Various approximations techniques, like variational bounds or mean field method, are invoked to obt

32
**ain the concentration tensors due to the**

ain the concentration tensors due to the complexity of real e generally based on Eshelby equivalent inclusion formulation [34]. When an elastic homogeneous ellipsoidal inclusion in infinite matrix is subjected to a uniform strain field
, called the eigenstrain, uniform stress and uniform strain is induced in the constrained inclusion. As an improvement over the Eshelby type formulation, Mori-Tanaka method considers the average strain as being caused by the inclusion as well as the perturbed matrix stress due to other reinforcements. The relation for the effective strain in the Mori-Tanaka method is given as
10
(2.5)
M
is the influence of the i

33
**nclusion, and it is represented as A=A-I**

nclusion, and it is represented as A=A-I+AMff
(2.6)
0110101011001011111534233effeffKKKPPPPPPXPPâˆ’
âˆ’âˆ’
is the shear modulus, is the bulk modulus,
Poisson’s ratio, volume fraction of the materials defined by the subscripts: 0=matrix, 1=fiber, eff=effective matrix. Figure 2.3. The cross section of a typical adherent cell showing the random distribution of actin stress fibers. In literature, various methods are available to model the homogenized nonlinear behavior of the composite [33]. In this work, the nonlinear behavior is captured using an incremental approach.

34
** The stress-strain curve for the materia**

The stress-strain curve for the material after homogenization for different volume fractions of the fiber is shown in Figure 2.4. As the volume fraction of the fiber decreases the property of matrix becomes less influenced by the fiber, thus decreasing the composite stiffness. The same effect is observed in many experimental
Actin Cortex
Nucleus Randomly Oriented Stress Fibers
C
y
toplasm
action on Poisson’s ratio of the composite. Numerical verification-finite element analysis The effectiveness of the developed model in accurately interpreting the experimental results is illustrated through the numerical simulation of two experimental pr

35
**ocedures in cell mechanics: Atomic Force**

ocedures in cell mechanics: Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Magnetic Twisting Cytometry (MTC). Following assumptions are considered in this The stress fibers are randomly distributed in the cytoplasm creating an isotropic material, whose effective properties are calculated using micromechanics.
the top of the cell (Figure 2.6). Finite element analysis is performed using commercial software, ABAQUS [41]. The finite element model consists of 2,637 nodes with a total of 2,746 linear axisymmetric elements. The material property of the cell is assumed to remain constant throughout the analysis and no active force generation is considered.
Figure

36
** 2.6. Half cell axisymmetric finite elem**

2.6. Half cell axisymmetric finite element model of the cell having a graded finer mesh towards the region of indentation. Numerical simulation of an AFM on a cell with a spherical indenter is carried out using ABAQUS [41]. The strain distribution of the cell with stress fiber volume fraction of 0.1% subjected to an indentation of 0.5 microns is shown in Figure 2.7. The actin cortical layer, which is in direct contact with the indenter, sustains the maximum deformation. The inner cytoplasm near the region of indentation also experiences very high strains and the intensity decreases away from the center. The total reaction force acting on the inde

37
**nter is calculated by considering the ho**

nter is calculated by considering the horizontal
ysis of axisymmetric cell model due to an indentation of 0.5 microns on the cell.
Figure 2.8. Force deflection curve for the cytoplasm having stress fiber volume fraction of 0.1 % and 1%.
with a finer mesh towards the bead region. The base of the block was constrained in all directions to create a cell fully adhered to the substrate and symmetric boundary conditions were applied to the half section. The bead centre was given a lateral force of 500 pN and the lateral displacement of the bead centre is determined from the analysis. The magnetic force was chosen based on the work by Karcher et

38
**al [2]. The bead and cell surface have a**

al [2]. The bead and cell surface have a tied contact as no slippage between bead and surface is considered for the analysis. The displacement of the bead centre is obtained from the finite element analysis of a cell block having a cytoplasm with a random distribution of stress fiber and an isotropic actin cortex, subjected to an axial force of 500 pN. The strain induced in the cell block with a volume fraction of 0.1% stress fiber under the load is shown in Figure 2.10 (A &B). The Figure shows that large strains are induced at the actin cortex. The region directly below the bead shows less deformation in comparison to the deformation at either en

39
**d of the bead-cell contact region. Figur**

d of the bead-cell contact region. Figure 2.11 shows the vertical displacement distribution of the cell block due to the load at the centre of the bead. The effect of stress fiber in the MTC simulation is shown in Figure 2.12, which indicates that as the volume fraction of the stress fiber increases a significant drop in the bead displacement occurs. This decrease in the displacement is an indication of the stiffening of the underlying material due to higher stress fiber volume fraction. To compare the simulated results with works by Ohayon et al. [43], the boundary condition in the finite element analysis was modified to model a torque instead of

40
**the lateral load at the bead center. Fig**

the lateral load at the bead center. Figure 2.13 compares the results from the literature and
Figure 2.10. Strain distribution induced by bead displacement along 1-2 (a), and 2-2 (b) directions due to a lateral load of 500 pN.
Figure 2.13.The comparison of bead rotation obtained from simulation with the results published in [43] (indicated by *) for a torque applied at the centre of the bead. Discussion Scanned images and experimental procedures have shown that there exist regions in cytoplasm having distinct mechanical properties. The homogenous material property definition of the cell is far from being accurate especially for an adherent

41
** cell in which stress fiber introduces s**

cell in which stress fiber introduces significant inhomogeneity. Discrete cell models like the cellular tensegrity models, which model the cell using a finite number of cytoskeletal filaments, have limitations in studying cell behavior. These limitations have led to a number of researchers turning towards continuum based models through the use of simplifying assumptions. One of the major limitations of simplified continuum based models, as pointed by Ingber et al. [11], is their inability to provide specific predictions related to the functional contribution of cytoskeletal filaments as effectively as the
this work considers only an elastic re

42
**sponse, which is acceptable since the lo**

sponse, which is acceptable since the loading time is assumed to be very small. Also an isotropic behavior is assumed for the homogenized cytoplasm due to the random distribution of stress fibers. Experimental studies using 3-D MTC by Hu et al. [8] have shown that the orientation of stress fibers is also important in material properties. Even though the current study does not consider the anisotropic nature of the cell due to the stress fiber orientation, its implementation along the lines of continuum micromechanics is possible. This factor would be captured by the RVE which would have oriented fibers leading to anisotropic behavior of the homogeni

43
**zed continuum. Thus, a natural extension**

zed continuum. Thus, a natural extension of the present work is to consider the viscoelastic components of the composite as well as to model the anisotropic properties of the cell due to aligned stress fibers. A homogenized constitutive model of the cell incorporating the distribution and amount of stress fibers has been developed in this study. The validation of the constitutive model using the finite element analysis on two most conventional experimental techniques of atomic force microscopy and magnetic twisting cytometry has been carried out. A satisfactory correlation between the simulated results and previously published results corroborate th

44
**e accuracy of the micromechanics model. **

e accuracy of the micromechanics model. Through this model, we have been able to state the stress fiber as a likely cause of the wide disparity in the above mentioned experimental results. Thus, through this model a
CHAPTER III ANALYSIS OF SOFT TISSUE ENVIRONMENT USING BIPHASIC MATERIAL Introduction The stimulus acting on cells in-vivo is altered by the properties of the surrounding environment. For example, cells response in soft tissues is influenced by the mechanical properties of the extra cellular matrix. So, to predict the behavior of cells , the material properties of the environment should be included in the mathematical model. In this

45
** chapter, the behavior of soft tissues i**

chapter, the behavior of soft tissues is analyzed using a biphasic material representation. A biphasic finite element model is developed and is also extended to model the tissue-fluid interfaces occurring in human body. Common examples of the tissue-fluid interactions are a) blood flowing through the artery wall, and b) synovial fluid and cartilage interactions [20, 44]. The computational models to study fluid-structure interactions in biomechanics have primarily relied on either an iterative solution of the solid and fluid domains or a sequential solution of the entire domain using a coupled algorithm [18-20]. Iterative solutions methodologies

46
**are computationally very expensive and h**

are computationally very expensive and hence cannot be used for large applications. Proper identification of boundary conditions at the interface l solution of sequential algorithm. Complexity of the fluid-structure interactions in biomechanical systems due to the geometry and the material properties requires numerical techniques like finite
normal and diseased artery wall. This chapter is organized in the following manner: The biphasic approach adopted in solving the solid fluid interface is outlined in Section B. In Section C the finite element verification of the adopted method is detailed and the application of the developed methods in solvi

47
**ng blood arterial wall behavior is shown**

ng blood arterial wall behavior is shown in Section D. Finally, summary and conclusion are drawn in Section E. A study of blood flow through the artery, or synovial fluid interaction with the cartilage requires an efficient computational methodology, capable of modeling a) the complicated geometry, b) representing the interface boundary conditions. The primary obstacle in a fluid-biphasic finite element model is the identification and implementation of matching interface boundary condition. Matching interface conditions for velocity, pressure and temperature in FE biphasic model is still not well established in literature [22, 48-52]. A detailed re

48
**view of various descriptions of the FE b**

view of various descriptions of the FE boundary conditions is provided by Alazmi et al [48]. Satisfaction of continuity of mass, momentum and energy, lead to the implementation of additional boundary conditions and of transformation functions in the FE formulation, which increased computational complexity of the formulation and also made the formulation problem specific. In this work, a new formulation avoiding the above drawbacks is presented. The computational domain selected for the finite element analysis, consists of a fluid domain and a tissue domain
separated by the interfacial boundary
as shown in Figure 3.1. The entire domain is represe

49
**nted as a biphasic material having
A**

nted as a biphasic material having
Assuming the biphasic material is composed of intrinsically incompressible components which are chemically inert, the governing equations are derived in the following manner for a domain
having a boundary
with total volume V which is the sum of fluid volume
f
and solid volume
s
. The fluid is assumed to be viscous and incompressible, while the solid is assumed to be linearly elastic and isotropic. The volume fractions of the fluid and solid phases are represented as
f
and
s
respectively, where
VV
refers to the solid and fluid phases respectively. It is to be noted that
Collagen
Tissue Fluid
Mobile Ions

50
**
Figure 3.2. Schematic representation of**

Figure 3.2. Schematic representation of soft tissue showing the distribution of water and The continuity equation for the biphasic material is given as ffss’ (3.1)
governing equation of biphasic medium by setting the volume fraction of solid phase to Finite element formulation Mixed finite element formulation, penalty finite element formulations, and a combination of mixed and penalty based formulations are some of the formulations implemented to consider the pressure term in modeling the biphasic model of tissue [47, 54, 55]. A penalty based finite element formulation is considered in this work [39, 40]. The penalty finite el

51
**ement formulation is based on the inter**

ement formulation is based on the interpretation that the continuity equation can be considered as a constraint on the velocity components, and
ffss’ (3.5)
is the user-specified penalty parameter. Using the above equation the modified governing differential equation is given
()2..0..0fffssfffsfssfffsfptrIIOPEIIIEIIIâˆ’âˆ’’’’’’âˆ’âˆ’ ’âˆ’’’âˆ’ IeeIvv + vvvv vvvv The weak form of the equation is given as
upKdâˆ’’âˆ’: (3.7)
�

52
**c;�**

c;vxxvvxxv
n
(3.14)
, separating time at
ttt' âˆ’
d = d+vv1vv,0,1nnnnnnDDD âˆ’Substituting equation (3.15) into the equivalent relation (3.13), gives the following (3.13), gives the following 11[(1)]nnnn'âˆ’'âˆ’C+Kv =FKdv (3.16)
. Solution of equation (3.16) with an appropriate choice of the penalty parameter [14], gives the velocity components of the solid and fluid phase in the Tissue-fluid interface modeling The volume fraction of fluid phase in the tissue-fluid domain is discontinuous along the interface surface. To

53
** develop a well-posed mathematical probl**

develop a well-posed mathematical problem it is required to satisfy conservation of mass, energy and momentum in the domain and also ion at the interface surface [20]. For an incompressible solid and incompressible fluid phase for the conservation of mass on interfacial surface is represented by the following jump condition
In previous works, the above boundary condition was incorporated in the finite element formulation using a set of interface elements connecting fluid and tissue domains [22]. Interface elements satisfied the interface boundary condition over an elemental area, thus introducing artificial thickness to the interface. This le

54
**ad to the prescription of duplicate node**

ad to the prescription of duplicate nodes at a point on the interface surface, connected through multipoint constraints or through transformation matrixes. The formulation of finite element along these lines increaseA new approach to satisfy equation (3.21) without an interelement layer is presented below. A continuous function of solid phase volume fraction, which tends to ) near the interface boundary in the tissue domain, is assumed in this work. Thus, in the limit as we approach the interface surface from the tissue domain
the above assumption leads to the following continuity equation over the boundary surface.
lim
f
fssfTTTTTvvv (3.22) The

55
** following boundary condition for fluid **

following boundary condition for fluid velocity is obtained at the interface
f
(3.23) and on comparison with equation (3.21) and (3.22), satisfies the compatibility equation. Thus it is assumed that the fluid velocity in the fluid domain and the tissue domain across the interface surface is satisfied one-on-one basis and not in the weighted sense as described in other works. The change in
s
T
occurs at elements in the interface boundary in the tissue domain and at every point inside the element the
2
f
T
(3.24)
(3.25)
f
fFfT
(3.26)
relates the viscous effect of fluid channel to the drag of fluid flow in the porous layer,
f
T
is the

56
** viscosity of fluid in the porous medium**

viscosity of fluid in the porous medium, and
is the weighted viscosity ratio, and are the heights of fluid and biphasic medium, respectively, and are set to 1.0 m and 0.25 m, respectively. The computational domain and material parameters are selected from Chan et al [22]. The solid volume fraction of the In a rigid porous medium the displacement and velocity of the solid phase are set to zero for the entire domain. The viscosity of the fluid in
is taken as 1.0 Ns/mand a unit velocity is prescribed at the top layer of fluid domain. The simulation is carried out for different values of and
and compared with results presented in [22]. The normalize

57
**d fluid flux
in the fluid layer and the**

d fluid flux
in the fluid layer and their comparison for a rigid biphasic-fluid medium for different test cases is shown in Figure 3.4. The variation of the fluid flux across the interface is found to be smooth in the present analysis. From these figures it is evident that the new formulation is capable of predicting the fluid flux in the rigid biphasic region and the fluid region accurately.
formulation is implemented in the study of blood flow through an artery, which forms the rest of the chapter.
FluidFlux
Height
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-0.75
-0.5
-0.25
0.25Simulation(1)Simulation(2)Simulation(3)Chanetal,2000(1)Chanetal,2000(2)Chanetal,2000(3)
Fi

58
**gure 3.4. Comparison of simulated normal**

gure 3.4. Comparison of simulated normalized fluid flux distribution across a rigid biphasic and fluid layer and analytical solutions for different flow conditions.
Arterial walls are incompressible materials having a nonlinear stress-strain response with a stiffening effect at high pressures. Analysis of arterial wall using linear/nonlinear elastic/viscoelastic approaches for different physiological conditions has been carried out by many authors. A review on the various constitutive models used for artery wall is provided by [56]. Artery wall-blood flow interactions have been treated extensively with a detailed review provided by Quarteroni et

59
** al. [57]. In almost all of the models, **

al. [57]. In almost all of the models, artery wall was treated as a solid material and fluid-solid interactions were considered using additional boundary conditions. Biphasic models of artery walls have been previously implemented to study the transfer of macromolecules in the arterial walls from the blood [58-60]. A schematic representation of the cross-section of symmetric artery wall is shown in Figure 3.7. Blood flows through the inner region called the lumen, which is bounded by a thin layer of endothelial cells, called the endothelium. A glycocalyx of macromolecules, having an average thickness of 60 nm coats the luminal surface of the endot

60
**helium. The solid volume fraction of gly**

helium. The solid volume fraction of glycocalyx region is very small in the limit tending to zero [61, 62]. Compared to the lumen diameter and endothelial layer the thickness of glycocalyx is very small and is neglected in most of the analysis. Outer to the endothelial layer is the intima, consisting of connective tissues. In normal healthy artery intima layer is very thin and makes an insignificant contribution to the material properties of the arterial wall. Thickening of intima is associated with pathological condition called arteriosclerosis [63]. The intima is bounded on the outer region by the
Figure 3.7). The viscosity of blood is 3.510

61
**Pa.s and the viscosity of fluid in the a**

Pa.s and the viscosity of fluid in the arterial wall is taken as 0.7210
Pa.s. The geometric and material parameters selected for the analysis is shown in Table 3.1. As the thickness of glycocalyx layer is in the order of nanometers, the region is not explicitly modeled in the finite element model. Also, it is assumed that the solid phase volume fraction of the arterial wall tends to zero at the glycocalyx region near the blood-wall interface. At the inlet a fully developed blood flow velocity is prescribed with a central line velocity of 0.17 m/s and at the outlet of the lumen free boundary conditions are prescribed. The solid displacement of the la

62
**teral ends of the arterial wall is fixed**

teral ends of the arterial wall is fixed in both directions and kept free at the top outer adventitia layer. Symmetric boundary conditions are taken at the center of the lumen. The rectangular artery tube is meshed using 100 quadrilateral elements. A finer mesh is provided near the interface surface to capture the sudden variation in the field variables. Table 3.1. Material parameters of artery wall. Layer
Porosity 0.005 0.083 0.002 0.258 0.001
Permeability (/(.)mNs6.2510
2.010
4.3210
2.0104.3210
Thickness (microns) 5 10 5 160 300
Elastic Modulus 67.56.75 kPa 0.06756.75 Pa 67.5 kPa
Finite element analysis of the artery tube domain with a sy

63
**mmetric center line is carried out. The**

mmetric center line is carried out. The variation of fluid velocity in the arterial wall and the lumen at the longitudinal center of the domain is shown in Figure 3.8. Similar to the inlet profile, a
0.050.10.150.200.0010.0020.0030.004Radial distance from lumen center (m)Axial fluid velocity (m/s)
Figure 3.8. Axial fluid velocity in the lumen and arterial wall showing a parabolic velocity profile in the lumen while in the arterial wall a negligible axial fluid flow is To model the physiological event of a failure of the lining (e.g. cell death), the permeability of the epithelial layer is now varied. Figure 3.12 shows the variation of the fi

64
**ltration velocity with change in the rat**

ltration velocity with change in the ratio of permeability of the epithelial tissue keeping a standard value of3.210m
. The values are chosen to provide a wide range of permeability differences to effectively capture the influence of the endothelial layer to blood flow. It is evident from the figure that as the permeability is increased the filtration velocity also increases. In actuality, these conditions translate as a forerunner to atherosclerosis where the arterial wall becomes porous to lipids, due to an injury to
-1.5E-08-1.0E-08-5.0E-090.0E+005.0E-091.0E-081.5E-0800.020.040.060.080.1Axial distance from inlet (m)
Displacement (m)
Figu

65
**re 3.11.Axial solid displacement profile**

re 3.11.Axial solid displacement profile of the top arterial wall layer, a sinusoidal displacement profile is observed from the analysis.
0.000050.00010.000150.00021.E-201.E-181.E-161.E-141.E-12Permeability Coefficient
Velocity (m/s)
Figure 3.12.Variation of filtration velocity with permeability coefficient of epithelial layer, as the permeability decreases the filtration velocity also decreases.
The axial length of the domain is taken as 0.085 m, with the stenotic region modeled at a distance of 0.035 m from the inlet. The thickness of the wall assumed to be of 410
with equal thickness for media and adventitia. The porosity of inner layer

66
**is assumed to be 0.25 while for the oute**

is assumed to be 0.25 while for the outer layer it is taken as 0.05. An elastic modulus of 67.5 kPa and 6.75 GPa is assumed for the inner and outer layer respectively. Viscosity of fluid in the arterial wall is taken as 0.7210
Pa.s. The blood is assumed to be viscous and incompressible. To analyze the influence of stenosis in the blood flow, simulation is carried out for stenotic blocks of 25 %, 40%, 50% and 60%. A block is defined as “Block %= (R)/ RX 100),” where R is the radius of the constricted tube. The variation of fluid velocity and solid displacement and the pressure drop due to the A 4-noded quadrilateral element having 4 degrees of freed

67
**om per node is used to mesh the entire d**

om per node is used to mesh the entire domain. The tissue-fluid interface lies along an interelement boundary region and a finer mesh is provided at the entrance and at the stenotic region of the artery. A tolerance limit of 0.001 was provided for convergence in the analysis. At the lumen inlet a fully developed velocity profile is prescribed with a central velocity of 0.024 m/s and at the outlet of the lumen, free boundary conditions are given. The arterial wall was constrained in both directions at the two ends. The axial velocity profile of the blood for the various cases of blocks is shown in Figure 3.13.
observed to increase with stenosis

68
** severity. Similar findings for changes**

severity. Similar findings for changes in the negative pressure for different blocks were published by Bathe and Kamm [18]. The variation of the solid vertical displacement of the top layer of wall for different degrees of block of the tube is shown in Figure 3.16. An inward (negative) displacement of the top layer near to the fluid inlet is seen which then recovers and have an outward displacement in the pre-steonsois region. The maximum displacement attained at the pre-stenosis region is less for constricted tube when compared to a normal tube. The maximum value of the displacement decreases with increasing block upto 50% block and a reduction i

69
**n the solid displacement of 60% block po**

n the solid displacement of 60% block positive displacement is observed. The likely reason for this change is the influence of the negative pressure on the arterial wall behavior as evident from the maximum negative displacement profile seen at post stenosis region for 60% block artery. In the post-stenosis region inward (negative) displacement is maximum for 60% block, and decreases for 50% block and no inward displacement is observed for other blocks. The alteration of the fluid flow pattern and wall behavior has been reported to be responsible for the further deterioration of the artery wall causing vascular diseases. For a complete analysis of

70
**the progression of disease more cases ne**

the progression of disease more cases needs to be studied.
The close interaction of fluid flow and soft tissues in the biological systems makes the study of solid-fluid interaction a critical component in understanding the behavior of soft tissues. Studies of the fluid-structure interaction in biomechanics have mostly relied on the use of iterative solutions of the solid and fluid phases. These methods require multiple iterations due to the coupling of the fluid and solid phases. A new tissue-fluid interface model using biphasic representation of the fluid and tissue is developed in this chapter. The computational methodology does not require th

71
**e prescription of additional boundary co**

e prescription of additional boundary conditions or interface elements. Conservation requirements of mass, momentum, and energy are satisfied across the interelement boundary. The finite element implementation of the model is carried out and verified with standard problem of fluid flow over a porous medium and is used in the study of blood flow through an artery. Mathematical modeling of blood flow-arterial wall systems is difficult as it involves large wall deformations, pulsative flow behavior and fluid structure interaction. To simplify the analysis in this work, the flow is assumed to be of steady state and the heterogeneity of the blood was al

72
**so neglected. The material properties of**

so neglected. The material properties of the wall were considered as linearly elastic even though the vessel wall should be multilayered, orthotropic and non-uniform in nature. The effect of the permeability of arterial wall on the filtration velocity, which is a forerunner to atherosclerosis, is also
CHAPTER IV COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF CANCER CELLS AND TUMOR TISSUES Introduction Cancer, which can develop from cells of virtually all types of tissue, is one of the leading causes of premature death in the western world. A recent release from the World Health Organization (WHO) shows that malignant tumors were responsible for 12% of nearly 56 m

73
**illion deaths from all causes worldwide **

illion deaths from all causes worldwide in the year 2000. It also predicts that the cancer rates will increase by 50% and will emerge as a major public health problem. The alarming rate of contracting cancer has caused a great deal of research activities in the identification and treatment of cancer. Although research on cancer in the medical field is predominantly experimental, theoretical and computational modeling research into the biomechanics and biophysics of cancer can contribute significantly towards the understanding of cancer. Through an effective correlation between the modeling and experimental studies, various interactions occurring in

74
**a cancer tissue can be used for the deve**

a cancer tissue can be used for the development of a comprehensive model. Also, any mathematical/mechanistic model of tumor will increase the pace of the research by cutting down on the experimental requirements. Cancer is a multistep phenomenon in which “normal” healthy cells are converted to abnormal cells that can multiply uncontrollably. Cancer develops due to the damage of genetic material in a cell and further its accumulation over a period of time either due to biological factors or environmental factors. Genetically three factors
are two distinct regions in the tumor tissue, an inner necrotic core consisting of dead cells, and an outer r

75
**im of proliferating tumor cells. As tumo**

im of proliferating tumor cells. As tumor grows, it induces stress on surrounding healthy tissues. At this stage, tumor is normally benign and has a low probability of recurrence after treatment. The enzymatic dissolution of dead tumor cells releases angiogenic growth factors in the tumor tissue. The growth factors diffuse from the center of the tumor to the edges, finally reaching surrounding blood vessels. Through a series of physiological processes new blood vessels, which supply nutrients to tumor tissue, are developed. This process is called tumor angiogenesis. With no limitation on the supply of nutrients, tumor tissues grow profusely leading

76
** to the metastases stage. In the primary**

to the metastases stage. In the primary metastases stage, as shown in Figure 4.2, the tumor invades the surrounding tissues by breaking the tissue membrane. The tumor tissue at this stage consists of an increased number of dividing cells, with variation in nuclear size and shape, variation in cell size and shape, loss of specialized cell features, and loss of normal tissue organization. At an advanced stage of metastases, cancer cells enter the vascular and lymphatic system and reach different regions of the body. This leads to the formation of secondary tumor at sites far from the initial formation region. These tumors are malignant and have a hig

77
**her probability of recurrence even after**

her probability of recurrence even after removal of the tumor. Malignant tissue also has distinctive appearance under the microscope that influences the mechanical behavior of tumor tissue. Experiments on benign and malignant breast tissues have found that cancerous tissues are 10 times stiffer than a normal tissue at 1% strain and more than 70 times as stiff at 15 %strain [73].
analysis of AFM data uses a homogenous isotropic model of the cytoplasm so as to reduce the number of unknown material parameters [30]. Such simplifications of material properties limit the applicability of these models in understanding the effects of pathological condi

78
**tions like cancer. The effect of cancer **

tions like cancer. The effect of cancer is localized and its effect is primarily felt on the disruption of actin structures [75]. Experimental evidence also suggests that corresponding material stiffness of cell changes with cancer. Previous computational models of cells are incapable of connecting the physiological changes in a cell due to cancer with its mechanical property [30]. Thus a new mathematical model, based on structural micro-constituents of cell is developed in this work. The material model is developed so as to be capable of incorporating large deformations suffered during AFM and also capable of considering the alteration in This wor

79
**k is based on the assumption that actin **

k is based on the assumption that actin cytoskeleton suffers the maximum alteration, compared to other cytoskeletal filaments, in the event of cancer attack [76]. Actin filament forms two primary structures of actin cortex and stress fibers in the cytoplasm. These changes in these structures due to cancer affect the mechanical property of the cell. Thus, the material model is developed based on the compartmentalized structure of outer actin cortex, inner cytoplasm and nucleus as presented in Chapter II. : The material constitutive model of the cytoplasm is implemented in a finite element analysis of AFM, as shown below. In this work, an elastic ana

80
**lysis is considered and it is assumed th**

lysis is considered and it is assumed that only basal stress fibers are formed
(a) (b) Figure 4.3. Finite element model for the analysis of a) benign and b) malignant tumor cell obtained with an indentation using a spherical indenter of 4 microns actin directly above the nucleus. Results and discussion Numerical simulation of an AFM on a benign and malignant tumor cell with a spherical indenter of 4 microns, with the boundary conditions as outlined in the previous section is carried out using ABAQUS [41]. The actin cortex and cytoplasm is considered as a hyperelastic material and for the ease of modeling a neo-Hookean material model is appl

81
**ied. Assuming the filament length and pe**

ied. Assuming the filament length and persistence length of actin in benign and tumor cells to be a constant, the entire network is assumed to be made of shear modulus is calculated for benign tumor cell using polymer physics theories [35]. The decrease in the elastic modulus of actin cortex for malignant tumor is then attributed to the actin filament concentration alone. Theoretical and experimental studies have shown that decrease in actin filament concentration decreases the networ
obtained by noting the total reaction force acting at the reference point of the rigid indenter for an increase in displacement of the indenter. The force deflecti

82
**on curve from rresponding experimental v**

on curve from rresponding experimental values is shown in Figure 4.4. Figure 4.4a shows the comparison of the curves for benign tumor cell and Figure 4.4b shows the corresponding curves for malignant tumor cells. From the figures it is evident that the numerical simulation closely matches with the experimental force deflection curves. This validates the constitutive modeling approach adopted in this work. So, it could be concluded form these results that the change in material property of cancerous cell is primarily attributed to the difference in the actin cytoskeleton concentration, which has been verified in the confocal images of cancerous cells

83
** available in literature. For the mater**

available in literature. For the material property, whose force deflection curve matches closely with the experimental data, the strain and displacement characteristics are studied. The strain distribution of both the normal and malignant cells is shown in Figures 4.5 (a) and (b) respectively. From the figures it is evident that the maximum strain occurs on the actin cortical layer which is in direct contact with the indenter. The inner cytoplasm and the nucleus directly below the indentation also suffer considerable strain and the intensity decreases away from the center. The deflection profiles for the benign and malignant cancer cells are shown

84
** in Figures 4.6 (a) and (b).
Figure**

in Figures 4.6 (a) and (b).
Figure 4.5. Strain distribution for AFM indentation simulation for (a) benign and (b) malignant tumor cell.
Constitutive Modeling of Tumor Tissues The tumor constitutive models are basically divided into discrete cell based and continuum based models. A good number of single cell based models accounting for growth as well as excellent reviews on them are available in the literature (cellular automaton models, off lattice models [77]). In this chapter, the modeling of tumor tissues using continuum based approach is presented so that it can be considered in the computational modeling of tumor behavior using tool

85
**s like FEA and computational fluid dynam**

s like FEA and computational fluid dynamics. Thus, the primary focus in this section is to provide an overview on the constitutive modeling of the tumor tissues in the study of general mechanical behavior of tissues as well as in the cancer growth. In the macroscopic modeling of tumors, continuum assumption holds wherein representative volume element of the tumor contains sufficiently large number of cells and is continuous in space. The representative volume element (RVE) properties at any point in the tumor are considered as an average of properties over the local region centered at this point. The elastic stresses at any point in tumor is regard

86
**ed as the average force per unit area be**

ed as the average force per unit area between adjoining blocks of the tumor rather than as quantities determined by individual cell to cell interactions [78]. Based on the mechanics adopted in the modeling of tumor tissues, the constitutive models fall into
free energy function
such that the following equation holds for compressible elastic material
T
(4.3)
is the material density, is the stress tensor, and is the deformation gradient tensor. For an incompressible material, which does not show appreciable change in volume with deformation, the following relationship holds [84]
T
âˆ’FIF (4.4) Different strain energies can be assig

87
**ned to different materials, and are gene**

ned to different materials, and are generally represented in terms of deformation gradient tensor F or left Cauchy-Green Tensor B. A free energy function, assumed to be a linear function of the principal invariants of B, is represented as [53] CICII
âˆ’âˆ’ (4.5) and C are constants, and and are the principal invariants of B. The stress âˆ’IBB (4.6)
are material parameters obtained from experiments. The above material representation is called Mooney-Rivlin material. Neo-Hookean materials have the constitutive equation defined by the equation
The growth factor with time is introduce

88
**d using a total time derivative where th**

d using a total time derivative where the constitutive law to describe a linearly elastic tumor subjected to continuous volume
111.3Tr3..232vvvÏƒÏƒÏƒEDt
GZZ’’ ’âˆ’ (4.9) where v and
are the velocity vector and vorticity tensor, respectively. The variation in mechanical property of tumor with time was captured in a time dependent strain energy formulation by Greenspan [85]. The benign and malignant tumors were modeled using different strain energy functions. The degree of malignancy/differentiation of the tumor was obtained through the variation of the strain energy function with time. The strain ener

89
**gy with time varying parameters is
�**

gy with time varying parameters is
123,,,3tttOPDOOO âˆ’ (4.10) d tumor to a poorly differentiated tumor, the strain energy changes from (,,)MNÎ±****(,,)MNÎ±. In this work, the strain energy function was further applied to model the cells causing different strain energy for normal cells and tumor cells. Chaplain et al [81] developed a mathematical model for the growth of a solid tumor using membrane and thick shell theory. The material composition of the model was obtained through the strain-energy function and the analysis was carried out using nonlinear elasticity theory. In this wo

90
**rk, the growing tumor is treated as an i**

rk, the growing tumor is treated as an inflating
The theory of mixtures and poroelasticity are widely used multiphase models in the modeling of tumors. In a strict sense, poroelasticity could be considered as a subsidiary of the theory of mixtures model.The basic assumption of the modeling is that the tissue is considered as being an elastic medium having a localized flow and fluid injection and absorption points. The solid phase consists of the cells, collagen and proteoglycans of the extracellular matrix while the liquid phase consists of the free flowing fluid of the communicating pore space [93]. Through the derivation of Please et al. [94]

91
**proposed one of the first multiphase liq**

proposed one of the first multiphase liquid models of tumor in the study of tumor growth. In this work, the tumor was assumed to be composed of two phases of fluid: an inviscid tumor cell and the extracellular water. The force balance on the water is obtained by considering the extracellular water to flow between the cells of the tumor body, and the cell mass acting as the porous media. Breward et al. [95] used similar approach in modeling the tumor as a two-phase model, where the aqueous phase was inviscid and the cell was considered as a viscous material with the viscosity depended on the degree of differentiation of the cancerous cell. Using the

92
**constitutive relation derived through th**

constitutive relation derived through this method, the tumor growth was studied in a 1-D system. The tumor growth in the vascular stage is characterized by the presence of vascular supply chains supporting the cancerous cells. These leaky blood vessels increase the fluid pressure inside the tumor tissue which affects the solid cells in tumor. This causes a strong solid-fluid coupling and attempts are made to model the tumor
TvIvvmTTTTTTTTIOIPI âˆ’âˆ’’’’ (4.12) denotes the elastic cellular interactions,
represents the shear resistance

93
**is the density of cells. An extension al**

is the density of cells. An extension along these lines was carried out by Byrne and Preziosi [97].Roose et al. [98], studied the stress generated by the tumor growth through a linear poroelastic model having a solid phase made up by the cells and the extracellular matrix by the fluid phase. The relation between the stress and strain on the cell/matrix phase of the tissue was given as
ijijkkijijijGKGpK
HGGKG âˆ’âˆ’âˆ’ (4.13)
2
j
i
uu
x
is the strain, is the bulk modulus of the tissue, the shear
is the volume of new tissue created per unit volume of tissue. Byrne el at. [99] considered the tumor as a two-phase component where the cell

94
**and the water phases were treated as inc**

and the water phases were treated as incompressible fluids. It is assumed that there are no voids or excluded volume in the tissue. The constitutive model is developed by treating the cell and water phases as incompressible fluids with the cell treated as a viscous fluid and the water as an inviscid fluid satisfying the following stress equations
pore fluid pressure, small incremental deformations, isotropic material properties and the constituents were assumed to be incompressible. The interstitial fluid pressure was modeled based on two mechanisms of equilibration: reversal of low from the interstitial space back into the blood vessels and exu

95
**dation of fluid into surrounding normal **

dation of fluid into surrounding normal tissue. Analysis was carried out for the growth of a spherical tumor with a moving boundary. Poroelastic models have been used to predict stress as well as interstitial pressure in tumor and surrounding host tissues [103-106]. A solid multiphase model of the growing with a linear elastic solid and an inviscid fluid assumption was developed by Araujo and McElwain [107]. Araujo and McElwain [83] also considered the extended version of the previous model to account the residual stress evolution in a growing multicell spheroid system. Examples of Tumor Modeling Computational models are being implemented for the

96
**diagnosis of tumor tissue in breast, spi**

diagnosis of tumor tissue in breast, spine and brain. Diagnosis and identification of most types of cancer occurs after the second stage of tumor growth, when a significant number of cancerous cells are formed within a healthy tissue. The tumor tissue, which has distinct material and structural property over a healthy tissue, makes it easy for real time diagnosis of tumor. Tools like finite element methods are integrated with techniques like MRI and elastography [108] to develop powerful diagnostic tools. The models are capable of predicting the behavior of tumor tissue when embedded in healthy tissue and to identify the size and location of tumor.

97
**Some of applications of finite element m**

Some of applications of finite element models
Macroscopic level models are also handy in treatment plans like surgical removal, and chemotherapy. A simulation of tumor and surrounding tissue behavior during the surgery would make it easy for the surgery planning and removal of tumor tissue. Chemotherapy and medicinal treatment occurs through diffusion and convection processes. A macroscopic model of tumor showing the uptake of medicines and its concentration levels at different stages helps in the treatment of tumor. Through a parametric study of the material properties of actin, cytoplasm and nucleus the elastic modulus of the different regions

98
** are determined from this study. For the**

are determined from this study. For the first time a numerical study is able to correlate the concentration of actin filament with the material property, and ultimately to the experimentally determined force deflection curves from an AFM. The limitation of AFM in the diagnosis of cancer cells, imposed by the assumptions of Hertz model is overcome through this work. The close interaction of computational modeling process with the experimental procedure would be immensely helpful in the extensive application of AFM in the field of cancer diagnosis. A review of the mechanical models of tumor tissues is also provided in this chapter. From the review on

99
** tumor tissue models it could be conclud**

tumor tissue models it could be concluded that the biphasic models are best suited for the analysis of tumor tissues for growth and in
in a bioreactor is simulated. The chapter is outlined as follows: A review of mathematical representation of mass transport phenomenon and its finite element implementation is presented in Section B. The application of the finite element model in the transfer of LDL from the blood to the arterial wall and the glucose transfer in a bioreactor is presented in Section C and Section D respectively, followed by a summary Finite Element Formulation The mass transport within the biphasic material is given by the follo

100
**wing
.v CDCq’âˆ’’**

wing
.v CDCq’âˆ’’ in
(5.1) is the concentration of the solute in the medium,
f
is the velocity of the fluid is the reaction rate that considers the generation, consumption or degradation of the solute mass, is the diffusion coefficient. Diffusion coefficient is dependent on the molecular size, the solvent and temperature. As the molecular size increases the diffusion coefficient decreases which is a factor critical in the design of pharmaceuticals. In convective transfer, the effect of molecular size is not prominent. So, convection plays a major role in the transfer of larger molecules through the system. In a biologi

101
**cal system, the interstitial flows are q**

cal system, the interstitial flows are quite small and the convection portion of the equation is neglected. However, the mass transfer occurring in an artery and in bioreactors is predominantly through convection transfer and cannot be neglected.
The finite element model developed for mass transfer is then coupled with the biphasic finite element model presented in Chapter III. The fluid velocities are calculated from the biphasic model and incorporated into equation (5.5). The proposed formulation leads to five degrees of freedom per node, and the solute velocity is assumed to be the same as fluid velocity. To model fluid and biphasic interface fo

102
**r solute transfer, the interface between**

r solute transfer, the interface between fluid and biphasic region falls along an interelement boundary. At the interface, continuity of mass is automatically satisfied as there is a continuity of fluid velocity and mass addition or deletion is not considered at the boundary interface. Atherosclerosis is a pathogenic condition of the cardiovascular system affecting medium to large arteries [65]. Experimental and theoretical studies have conclusively proven that the transfer of atherogenic substances (like LDL) from the blood to the artery wall is a critical factor involved in the development of atherosclerosis. The arterial wall consists of primari

103
**ly three layers: intima, media, and adve**

ly three layers: intima, media, and adventitia. The intima is the innermost region of the arterial wall, which comes in contact with the blood flow. It consists of a single layer of endothelial cells which acts as the primary barrier to mass influx from the blood. Computational modeling of LDL uptake by the arterial wall requires mathematical models for the transfer of solutes in the blood, transfer of LDL from blood
concentration of the solutes, flow parameters, etc. The large number of variables, its proper identification and control to obtain valid data represents significant challenges in numerical analysis of solute transfer. To simplify the

104
**analysis, a simple geometric representat**

analysis, a simple geometric representation of blood flow A straight tube artery with a multilayered arterial wall without the outer adventitia is modeled in this study. The lumen is assumed to be 0.0031 m in radius with the length assumed to be 0.083 m. The thin glycocalyx region of the artery is not modeled and the blood flowing through the lumen is in direct contact with the endothelial region. A fully developed flow is considered at the entrance with a mean velocity of 0.17 m/s. The domain is meshed using 4-node quadrilateral finite elements with the blood-wall interface lying along an interelement boundary region. Analysis is carried out to stu

105
**dy the deposition of LDL in the artery w**

dy the deposition of LDL in the artery wall and also the influence of various physiological factors in the LDL distribution. The permeability and porosity of the endothelial region are the two main factors that would be considered in this study. The domain is meshed using a 100×50 mesh of four-node quadrilateral finite elements A fully developed velocity profile is provided at the inlet of the lumen with a mean velocity of 24 cm/s, and at the exit of the lumen a free flowing condition is prescribed. At the centre of the lumen symmetry boundary conditions are prescribed. At the inlet and exit of the artery wall zero axial velocity is provided. All th

106
**e solid degrees of freedom are constrain**

e solid degrees of freedom are constrained in the fluid phase as well as the tissue domain. A constant LDL concentration at the inlet is prescribed, with zero transverse gradients at
0.20.40.60.81.200.10.20.30.4Distance from symmetry line (cm)Normalized Cross-sectiona
l
Concentration
Figure 5.1. Concentration profile in lumen and artery wall.
0.10.20.30.40.50.60.3250.32550.3260.32650.3270.32750.32
Distance from symmetry line (cm)Normalized Cross-sectional Concentration
Figure 5.2. Concentration profile in artery wall.
0.030.0350.040.0450.050.3250.3260.3270.328Distance from S
y
mmetr
Line
(
cm
Normalized Cross-sectional Concentration
100 X

107
**
10 X
1
Figure 5.4. Concentration profil**

10 X
1
Figure 5.4. Concentration profile for different values of the endothelial permeability.
0.10.20.30.40.50.3250.3260.3270.328Distance from S
y
mmetr
Line
(
cm
Normalized Cross-sectional Concentration
Vol. Frac: 0.995
Vol. Frac: 0.95
Vol. Frac: 0.90
Figure 5.5. Concentration profile for varying solid phase volume fractions of endothelial
optimality of temperature and pressure. The major parameters in tissue growth are constantly controlled and monitored in an artificial environment called bioreactorBioreactors are devices that provide tightly controlled environmental and operating conditions for the development of the tissue substitutes [27

108
**]. In tissue engineering, bioreactors ca**

]. In tissue engineering, bioreactors can be applied either for the conditioning the cells for transplantation, or to grow 3-D tissues prior to human implantation or as organ supporting devices [116]. In this section, we analyze the effects of nutrient distributions required for the growth of tissues as a replacement for human tissues. Tissues are formed from groups of cells by the action of external stimuli in the form of mechanical, electrical, or chemical impulses. In the absence of external stimuli tissue the cells become disorganized finally leading to cell death. Bioreactors apart from providing the environment for growth of the cells are als

109
**o required to maintain shape and provide**

o required to maintain shape and provide impulses in the form of mechanical conditioning or chemical signals for the generation of complex tissues from individual cells. The cells are initially attached onto a substrate through a process called ‘Scaffolds are biodegradable porous materials that provide mechanical support to the cells and shape to the final tissue substitute [117]. The mechanical properties of scaffolds like stiffness, porosity, permeability affect the tissue enhancement and the delivery of the final end product. Seeded scaffolds are then embedded in a growth medium inside the bioreactor culture chamber. Based on the design of cultur

110
**e chamber, bioreactors can be broadly cl**

e chamber, bioreactors can be broadly classified into two types a) Rotating bioreactors, where the culture medium is constantly in rotation and b) Non-rotating bioreactors, where the
Hollow fiber membrane bioreactor (HFMB) has been widely used for the tissue engineering of bones, cartilages because of their excellent nutrient transfer properties [118]. The HFMB consists of porous hollow fiber bundle enclosed in a culture reactor (see Figure 5.6). Fluid flowing through the capillaries supplies the nutrients into the culture chamber, which diffuses out of the lumen through the fiber membrane into the extra cellular space. The nutrients are transferre

111
**d in the capillaries through the convect**

d in the capillaries through the convective process, while diffusion dominates the transfer of nutrients in the scaffold. The diffusion of molecules from the lumen (fluid flowing region at the center) to the extra cellular space is dependent on the flow rate of the fluid, the porosity, and other Of all the parameters involved in the design of bioreactors, the transfer of nutrient is the most critical. Experimental studies on the transfer properties of nutrients in a reactor are difficult due to the requirement of real time data, and also due to the difficulty in controlling different parameters. Numerical studies provide a perfect platform to carry

112
** out a large number of simulations to op**

out a large number of simulations to optimize the functioning of bioreactors. The presence of a fluid and a biphasic interface makes it very suitable for the application of fluid-biphasic interface finite element model developed in Chapter III and the mass transfer finite element model described in Section B of this chapter. The primary objective of this study is to predict the nutrient distribution in the scaffold for different material properties of the scaffold and fiber.
(5.6) is the consumption scalar quantity, is the cell metabolic rate, is the cell seeding density. For a specific nutrient the metabolic rate is taken from literature

113
** and is assumed to be constant throughou**

and is assumed to be constant throughout the simulation. Results and discussion Finite element analysis of a bioreactor for glucose distribution was carried out using the fluid-biphasic interface model for mass transfer. The analysis was carried out to understand the influence of material properties of fiber and scaffold on the glucose distribution in the bioreactor. For comparison of the concentration profile and normalized reaction rate is defined. The normalized concentration unit is given as
(5.7) is the inlet concentration (mol/cm is the normalized concentration. A normalized reaction rate is defined as
0kk
R
(5.8) is first order

114
**reaction rate value, mol/(cm.s) and defi**

reaction rate value, mol/(cm.s) and defined in equation (5.6), subscript defines the nutrient type.
marginal decrease in the radial concentration of glucose is also observed along the length of the bioreactor. To provide a uniform distribution of nutrients it is required to maintain a sufficient inlet flow velocity.
0.80.810.820.830.840.0100.0150.0200.0250.0300.035Radius (cm)Normalized Concentratio
n
Z/L=0
Z/L=0.5
Z/L=1.0Figure 5.8. Radial variation of glucose along the axial length of the bioreactor. The variation of glucose concentration with the solid phase volume fraction of the scaffold is shown in Figure 5.9. From the analysis it is observed

115
** that the concentration of nutrients inc**

that the concentration of nutrients increases with a decrease in the solid phase volume fraction. The primary aim of the inlet fluid is to provide a constant supply of the nutrients into the bioreactor. Thus design considerations require only little perfusion from the lumen into the scaffold as the scaffolds are already encased in a fluid medium. It can be achieved by the proper design of the fiber and scaffold permeability. The axial fluid velocity distribution in the bioreactor is shown in Figure 5.10. As can be observed from
CHAPTER VI CONCLUSIONS Concluding Remarks and Summary In this dissertation, mechanical modeling of cells and tissues th

116
**at explicitly incorporate the structural**

at explicitly incorporate the structural components of biological materials are developed. In the constitutive modeling of cell, a homogenous continuum model of a cell incorporating the stress fibers was developed. Through the model it was identified that the stress fibers are the primary reason behind the wide disparity of the experimentally derived modulus for even the same cell type. A finite element simulation of some of the widely used experiments in the determination of cell properties was carried out to verify the developed constitutive model. In atomic force microscopy (AFM) finite element simulations, it was observed that the force-deflect

117
**ion curves obtained matches well with th**

ion curves obtained matches well with the experimental results. Similarly, in magnetic twisting cytometry (MTC) simulation, the stress fibers influence on the angle of twisting due to a magnetic torque was determined. The guidelines for derivation of mechanical property from the experiments are also provided in this work. As the embedding environment is also important for the response of cells a material modeling of soft tissue were carried out in Chapter III. The soft tissues constitutive models was developed using a biphasic approach, by incorporating the solid and fluid phases in a tissue. The biphasic material model is further extended to study

118
**the fluid-tissue interface, as seen in b**

the fluid-tissue interface, as seen in blood-arterial wall interface. The macroscopic
of glucose. The effect of material parameters of the scaffold on the nutrient distribution As an extension to the computational framework presented in this study, the following works could be carried out. Incorporate viscoelastic models of cell to represent other experiments, like micropipette aspiration, to determcell migration and cell adhesion Analyze the fluid-structure interactions of the tissue in a larger domain growth and remodeling of tissues
[13] Swan, C. C., Lakes, R. S., Brand, R. A., and Stewart, K. J., 2003, "Micromechanical based poroelastic model

119
**ing of fluid flow in haversion bone," AS**

ing of fluid flow in haversion bone," ASME Journal of , pp. 25-37. [14] Spilker, R. L., and Maxian, T. A., 1990, "A mixed-penalty finite element formulation of the linear biphasic theory for soft tissues," International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, (5), pp. 1063-1082. [15] Grodzinsky, A. J., Levenston, M. E., Jin, M., and Frank, E. H., 2000, "Cartilage tissue remodeling in response to mechanical , pp. 691-713. [16] DiSilvestro, M. R., Zhu, Q., and Suh, J. F., 2001, "Biphasic poroviscoelastic simulation of the unconfined compression of articular cartilage: II—Effect of variable 123(2), pp. 198-200. [17] Humphrey, J. D., and Yin, F. C

120
**. P., 1987, "A new constitutive formulat**

. P., 1987, "A new constitutive formulation for characterizing the mechanical behaviour of soft tissues," Biophysical Journal, 563-570. [18] Bathe, M., and Kamm, R. D., 1999, "A fluid-structure interaction finite element analysis of pulsatile blood flow through a compliant stenotic artery," Journal of , pp. 361–369. [19] Tang, D., Yang, C., Kobayashi, S., and Ku, D. N., 2001, "Steady flow and wall compression in stenotic arteries: A three-dimensional thick-wall model with fluid–wall 123(6), pp. 548-557. [20] Hou, J. S., Holmes, M. H., Lai, W. M., and Mow, V. C., 1989, "Boundary conditions at the cartilage-synovial fluid interface for joint lubricati

121
**on and theoretical verifications," Journ**

on and theoretical verifications," Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 111(1), pp. 78-87. [21] Lee, K. W., and Xu, X. Y., 2002, "Modelling of flow and wall behaviour in a mildly stenosed tube," Medical Engineering & Physics, , pp. 575-586. [22] Chan, B., Donzelli, P. S., and Spilker, R. L., 2000, "A mixed-penalty biphasic finite element formulation incorporating viscous fluids and material interfaces," Annals of Biomedical Engineering, (6), pp. 589-597. [23] Hofer, M., Rappitsch, G., Perktold, K., Trubel, W., and Schima, H., 1996, "Numerical study of wall mechanics and fluid dynamics in end-to-side anastomoses and correlation to intimal hyperplasi

122
**a," Journal of Biomechanical Engineering**

a," Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, (10), pp. 1297-1308. [24] Lei, M., Archie, J. P., and Kleinstreuer, C., 1997, "Computational design of a bypass graft that minimizes wall shear stress gradients in the region of the distal anastomosis," (4), pp. 637-646. [25] Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Walter, P., 2002, Molecular Biology of the Cell[26] Heidemann, S. R., and Wirtz, D., 2004, "Towards a regional approach to cell mechanics," Trends Cell Biol., (4), pp. 160-166.
[43] Ohayon, J., Tracqui, P., Fodil, R., Fereol, S., Laurent, V. M., Planus, E., and Isabey, D., 2004, "Analysis of nonlinear responses of adherent

123
** epithelial cells probed by magnetic bea**

epithelial cells probed by magnetic bead twisting: A finite element model based on a homogenization approach," Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 126, pp. 685-698. [44] Karner, G., Perktold, K., and Zehentner, H. P., 2001, "Computational modeling of macromolecule transport in the arterial wall," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, , pp. 491-504. [45] Chakravarty, S., and Datta, A., 1992, "Pulsatile blood flow in a porous stenotic (2), pp. 35-54. [46] Johnson, M., and Tarbell, J. M., 2001, "A biphasic, aniostropic model of the aortic (1), pp. 52-57. [47] Almeida, E. S., and Spilker, R. L., 1998, "Mixed and penalty finite

124
**element models for the nonlinear behavio**

element models for the nonlinear behavior of biphasic soft tissues in finite deformation: Part II - Nonlinear examples," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, (2), pp. 151-170. [48] Alazmi, B., and Vafai, K., 2001, "Analysis of fluid and heat transfer interfacial conditions between a porous medium and a fluid layer," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, , pp. 1735-1749. [49] Gartling, D. K., Hickox, C. E., and Givler, R. C., 1996, "Simulation of coupled viscous and porous flow problems,, pp. 23-48. [50] Costa, V. A. F., Oliveira, L. A., Baliga, B. R., and Sousa, A. C. M., 2004, "Simulation of coupled flows in adjac

125
**ent porous and open domains using a cont**

ent porous and open domains using a control volume finite element method," Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A, , pp. 675-697. [51] Cieszko, M., and Kubik, J., 1999, "Derivation of matching conditions at the contact surface between fluid-saturated porous solid and bulk fluid," Transport in Porous , pp. 319-336. [52] Massarotti, N., Nithiarasu, P., and Zienkiewicz, O. C., 2001, "Natural convection in porous medium-fluid interface problems," International Journal of Numerical Methods (5), pp. 473-490. [53] Reddy, J. N., 2008, An Introduction to Continuum Mechanics with ApplicationsCambridge University Press, NewYork. [54] Suh, J. K., Spilker, R. L., and H

126
**olmes, M. H., 1991, "A penalty finite el**

olmes, M. H., 1991, "A penalty finite element analysis for nonlinear mechanics of biphasic hydrated soft tissue under large deformation," International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, (7), pp. 1411-1439. [55] Ehlers, W., and Markert, B., 2001, "A linear viscoelastic biphasic model for soft tissues based on the theory of porous media," Journal of Biomechanical (5), pp. 418-423.
[69] Theodorou, G., and Bellet, D., 1986, "Laminar flows of a non-newtonian fluid in mild stenosis," Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering (1), pp. 111-123. [70] Liu, B., 2007, "The influences of stenosis on the downstream flow pattern in curved

127
**(8), pp. 868-876. [71] Pralhad, R. N., a**

(8), pp. 868-876. [71] Pralhad, R. N., and Schultz, D. H., 2004, "Modeling of arterial stenosis and its application to blood diseases," Mathematical Biosciences, , pp. 203-220. [72] Varghese, S. S., and Frankel, S. H., 2003, "Numerical modeling of pulsatile turbulent flow in stenotic vessels," Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 445-460. [73] Wellman, P. S., Howe, R. D., Dalton, E., and Kern, A. K., 1999, "Breast tissue stiffness in compression is correlated to histological diagnosis," Technical Report, [74] Guck, J., Schinkinger, S., and Lincoln, B., et al 2005, "Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformati

128
**on and metastatic competence," , pp. 368**

on and metastatic competence," , pp. 3689-3698. [75] Yamaguchi, H., and Condeelis, J., 2007, "Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell migration and invasion," Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular 1773, pp. 642-652. [76] Lambrechts, A., Troys, M. V., and Ampe, C., 2004, "The actin cytoskeleton in normal and pathological cell motility," International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell , pp. 1890-1909. [77] Drasdo, D., and Hohme, S., 2005, "A single cell based model of tumor growth in vitro: monolayers and spheroids," Physical Biology, , pp. 133-147. [78] Jones, A. F., Byrne, H. M., Gibson, J. S., and Dold, J. W., 2000, "A mathemat

129
**ical model of the stress induced during **

ical model of the stress induced during avascular tumour growth," Journal of Mathematical (6), pp. 473-499. [79] Ambrosi, D., and Preziosi, L., 2002, "On the closure of mass balance models for tumor growth," Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, (737-754). [80] Breward, C. J., Byrne, H. M., and Lewis, C. E., 2002, "The role of cell-cell adhesions in a two-phase model for avascular tumour growth," J.Math.Biol, , pp. 125-152. [81] Chaplain, M. A. J., and Sleeman, B. D., 1993, "Modelling the growth of solid tumours and incorporating a method for their classification using theory," Journal of Mathematical Biology, (5), pp. 431-473. [82] S

130
**amani, A., and Plewes, D., 2004, "A meth**

amani, A., and Plewes, D., 2004, "A method to measure the hyperelastic parameters of ex vivo breast tissue samples," Physics in Medicine and Biology, 4395–4405.
[97] Byrne, H. M., King, J. R., McElwain, D. L. S., and Preziosi, L., 2003, "A two phase model of solid tumour growth," Appl. Math. Lett., (4), pp. 567-573. [98] Roose, T., Netti, P. A., Munn, L. L., Boucher, Y., and Jain, R. K., 2003, "Solid stress generated by spheroid growth estimated using a linear poroelasticity model," , pp. 204-212. [99] Chen, C. Y., Byrne, H. M., and King, J. R., 2001, "The influence of growth-induced stress from the surrounding medium on the development of multicel

131
**l spheroids," Journal of Mathematical Bi**

l spheroids," Journal of Mathematical Biology, (3), pp. 191-220. [100] Byrne, H. M., and Preziosi, L., 2003, "Modelling solid tumours growth using the atical Medicine and Biology , pp. 341-366 [101] Lubkin, S. R., and Jackson, T., 2002, "Multiphase Mechanics of Capsule Formation Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 124, pp. 237-243. [102] Rice, J. R., and Cleary, M. P., 1976, "Some basic stress-diffusion solutions for fluid-saturated elastic porous media with compressible constituents," Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, (2), pp. 227-241. [103] Netti, P. A., Baxter, L. T., Boucher, Y., Skalak, R., and Jain, R. K., 1995, "A poroelastic model

132
**for interstitial pr, p. 346. [104] Roone**

for interstitial pr, p. 346. [104] Rooney, F., Ferrari, M., and Imam, A., 1996, "On the pressure distribution within , pp. 715–721. [105] Sarntinoranont, M., Rooner, F., and Ferran, M., 1999, "A mechanical model of a growing solid tumor: Implications for vascular collapse and drug transport," Proceedings of The First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference Serving Humanity, Advancing [106] Netti, P. A., Baxter, L. T., Boucher, Y., Skalak, R., and Jain, R. K., 1995, "Time dependent behavior of interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumors: Implications for drug delivery," Cancer Research, (22), pp. 5451-5458. [107] Araujo, R. P., and McElwain, D. L., 2004, "A histo

133
**ry of the study of solid tumour growth: **

ry of the study of solid tumour growth: the contribution of mathematical modelling," Bulletin of Mathematical Biology., (5), pp. 1039-1091. [108] Miga, M. I., 2003, "A new approach to elastography using mutual information and , pp. 467-480. [109] Jordan, P., Kerdok, A. E., Socrate, S., and Howe, R. D., 2005, "Breast tissue parameter identification for a nonlinear constitutive model," BMES Conference [110] Whyne, C. M., Hu, S. S., and Lotz, J. C., "Burst fracture in the metastatically involved spine: development, validation, and parametric analysis of a three-dimensional poroelastic finite-element model," Spine, (7), pp. 652-660.
VITA Ginu Unnithan

134
**Unnikrishnan received his Bachelor of Te**

Unnikrishnan received his Bachelor of Technology degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Kerala, India in 2000. He completed his Master of Science degree in 2003, from the Indian Institute of Technology Madras, India in civil engineering with a specialization in structural engineering and he worked on the shape optimization of the pneumatic tire using evolutionary optimization techniques in a distributed computing environment. He joined the doctoral program at Texas A&M University in September 2003 and graduated in May 2008. His research interests include multiscale modeling of biological cells and tissues; growth mechanics of tumor

135
**s and modeling of arterial pathological **

s and modeling of arterial pathological conditions like atherosclerosis and also mass transport analysis in the arteries and in bioreactors. Mr. Ginu Unnikrishnan may be reached through Professor J. N. Reddy (jnreddy@tamu.edu) in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, 3123 TAMU, College Station TX 77843-3123.
COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF BIOLOGICAL CELLS AND SOFT TISSUES GINU UNNITHAN UNNIKRISHNAN Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, J.N. ReddyCommittee Members, Ramesh Talreja Harry Hogan Xin-Lin Gao Head of Department, Den

136
**nis L. O’Neal May 2008
x
**

nis L. O’Neal May 2008
x
Page Figure 1.1. Schematic representation of a generalized cell........................................ 3 Figure 2.1. Stained image of bovine cell, green and red indicates cytoskeletal filaments and blue is the nucleus.............................................................. 12 Figure 2.2. Behavior of cytoskeletal filaments............................................................. 12 Figure 2.3. The cross section of a typical adherent cell showing the random distribution of actin stress fibers................................................................ 24 Figure 2.4. The stress-strain curve fo

137
**r the material after homogenization for **

r the material after homogenization for different volume fractions of the fiber...................................................... 25 Figure 2.5. The effect of stress fiber volume fraction on Poisson’s ratio of the composite...................................................................................................... 26 Figure 2.6. Half cell axisymmetric finite element model of the cell having a graded finer mesh towards the region of indentation............................ 28 Figure 2.7. Strain distribution obtainedement analysis of axisymmetric cell model due to an indentation of 0.5 microns on the cell.................................

138
**........................................**

................................................................................. 30 Figure 2.8. Force deflection curve for the cytoplasm having stress fiber volume fraction of 0.1 % and 1%.............................................................................. 30 Figure 2.9. Finite element mesh of the cell block selected for MTC simulation..... 33 Figure 2.10. Strain distribution induced by bead displacement along 1-2 (a), and 2-2 (b) directions due to a lateral load of 500 pN.................................... 34 Figure 2.11. The vertical displacement distthe centre of the bead...............................................................

139
**................... 35 Figure 2.12. The **

................... 35 Figure 2.12. The variation of the displacement of the bead centre with the change lume fraction.................................................................... 35
57
internal elastic lamina (IEL). Media and adventitia, which provides the tensile strength and prevent disruption of artery wall, forms the outer regions of artery wall. The arterial wall-blood interface is analyzed using the biphasic-fluid FE In the biphasic material representation of artery wall, the fluid phase represents the represents matrix phase consisting of collagen fibrils, proteoglycans, cells etc. [64]. The fluid in the tissue is assumed to be

140
**viscous and the solid a linearly elastic**

viscous and the solid a linearly elastic material. The values for arterial wall thickness and the lumen diameter are taken from literature. Blood flow through a healthy artery and a diseased artery due to atherosclerosis is analyzed using fluid-biphasic finite element model for time period of 1.0 s. Figure 3.7. Loading and boundary conditions of a symmetric lumen and arterial wall. Blood flow through healthy artery A multilayered model of a symmetric artery with a lumen radius of 3.1010
a and adventitia layers is selected (see
Adventitia
EndotheliumIntima
IEL
Media
Lumen
Adventitia
EndotheliumIntima
IEL
Media
Lumen
x
r
nutrient at the inlet is

141
** prescribed and the gradient on the top **

prescribed and the gradient on the top surface of the scaffold is taken as zero. The entire domain is represented by 1200 four-node quadrilateral elements and the interface between the fluid and fiber is made to lie across the interelement boundary region. The solid phase volume fraction is assumed to tend to zero near the interface as was the case for the blood artery wall interface. It is assumed that the cell density is uniform throughout the scaffold and the consumption of nutrients by the cells in scaffold is identical. The permeability and porosity of the fiber was taken as 16.110/N.s, and 0.25, respectively, while for the scaffold a permea

142
**bility of 6.6210/N.s, and porosity of 0.**

bility of 6.6210/N.s, and porosity of 0.85 was considered for the analysis. The diffusivity of glucose in the fluid 5.410/s, in the fiber 5.410
/s, and in the scaffold 1.110/s [118]. ) is taken as 1.010
mol/cell/s. Using equation (5.6) the reaction rate for the consumption of nutrient by the cell is calculated for different The mass transport in the lumen and fiber is governed by equations as described previously. In the extra cellular space, the cells absorb the nutrients through metabolic activities. It is assumed that the reaction is governed by the simple zero-order reaction kinetics for the uniform cell seeded bioreactor. The reaction rate for

143
** the k nutrient consumption is given by **

the k nutrient consumption is given by the following equation
nutrient at the inlet is prescribed and the gradient on the top surface of the scaffold is taken as zero. The entire domain is represented by 1200 four-node quadrilateral elements and the interface between the flinterelement boundary region. The solid phase volume fraction is assumed to tend to zero near the interface as was the case for the blood artery wall interface. It is assumed that the cell density is uniform throughout the scaffold and the consumption of nutrients by the cells in scaffold is identical. The permeability and porosity of the fiber was taken as 16.110/N.s, and 0.2

144
**5, respectively, while for the scaffold **

5, respectively, while for the scaffold a permeability of 6.6210/N.s, and porosity of 0.85 was considered for the analysis. The diffusivity of glucose in the fluid 5.410/s, in the fiber 5.410
1.1100The glucose cell metabolic rate (Vk) is taken as 1.010
the reaction rate for the consumption of nutrient by the cell is calculated for different The mass transport in the lumen and fiber is governed by equations as described previously. In the extra cellular space, the cells absorb the nutrients through metabolic activities. It is assumed that the reaction is governed by the simple zero-order reaction kinetics for the uniform cell seeded bioreactor. The

Please download the presentation after appearing the download area.

Download Pdf - The PPT/PDF document "DEDICATION" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Try DocSlides online tool for compressing your PDF Files Try Now

pptx
22 views

pptx
70 views

pdf
66 views

pptx
82 views

pptx
29 views

pptx
37 views

pptx
44 views

pptx
4 views

pptx
48 views

pdf-slides
1 views

pptx
66 views