This file is a part of the Rhodium site archive. This Aug 2004 static snapshot is hosted by Erowid
as of May 2005 and is not being updated. > > Back to Rhodium Archive Index > >
[] [] [Chemistry Archive]

Why Asarone Cannot be Used
in the Performic Oxidation

by Rhodium

I have finally found an article which deals with the precise reasons why asarone cannot undergo the performic oxidation to form a glycol, which then can be dehydrated and rearranged to asarone ketone (TMP2P).

According to Tetrahedron 42, 523-528 (1986), attempted oxidation of α-asarone with peracetic acid at room temp gave a heavily substituted tetrahydrofuran (a naturally occuring neolignan called Magnosalicin, or 2,4-dimethyl-3,5-bis(2',4',5'-trimethoxyphenyl)-tetrahydrofuran) in 16% yield along with its three other stereoisomers (of the same same structure but with the substituents pointing in other directions), the total yield being about 70%.

Magnosalicin is a red solid, while the other isomers are oils. This may account for the fact that the reaction mixture usually is thick and red after attempted performic or peracid oxidation of asarone.

The reaction mechanism is proposed to be the epoxide opening up under acidic conditions to give 3',4',5'-trimethoxyphenyl-2-propanol (TPMP2Pol) with a carbocation in the benzylic position (which is unusually stable because of the several electron-donating methoxy groups on the aromatic ring). This carbocation then adds to the 2-position on the side-chain of an unreacted asarone molecule, forming a carbon-carbon bond, as well as a new carbocation in the benzylic position of the attacked asarone molecule. This immediately adds to the alcohol and the tetrahydrofuran ring is formed.

There has been reports of people being able to oxidize asarone using buffered peracetic acid, and this is due to the formed epoxide not opening up under the reaction conditions, as the mixture is much closer to neutral than in the unbuffered reaction. The epoxide not opening up means that there will be no reactive carbocation formed, which could otherwise dimerize. Other successful epoxidations include the use of CH3CN/H2O2 and Oxone.

The question is now - is this a side reaction in the oxidation of isosafrole, and can it be prevented? There is another paper on this topic which may shed some light on this, in which they on an industrial scale oxidize anethole with peracetic acid, isolating the corresponding tetrahydrofuran in 5-10% yield (bp 135-160C/0.15mmHg) - Pharmazie 34, 22 (1979).

As the aromatic ring of isosafrole is of intermediate electron density compared to anethole and asarone, there is every reason to believe that in the unbuffered peracid oxidation of isosafrole, 2,4-dimethyl-3,5-bis- (3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-tetrahydrofuran is formed to an extent of between 10% and 40% yield (higher than anethole, but with a "roof" of ~40%, because evidently people have gotten yields of at least 60% using that route).